Friday 10 February 2017

Appendix 2: Markets will always reflect better than they predict: Friday, 10 February 2017: (05:22 )


On Wednesday 8th of February, MPs, members of parliament, voted the beginning of procedural of the English – EU divorce. A divorce asked by the public, which emphasises the democratic nature of the party. This democracy though is coming into contradiction with the voting system since the majority of the Lords were opposite of leaving EU, only 122 out of 494 agreed to start setting a deal otherwise it will ultimately leave without it.

The pound’s value has been fallen however, the Bank of England is estimating an investments increase for 2017, indicating an inefficient market which is not influenced or at least immediately by the news released. Probably due to many information released for different markets, like Brexit, German and French elections related to EU market, election of Trump related to American and South American market and ISIS for the Middle East market, have cancelled each other’s importance and the market has decided to wait. – “Defence for EMH”

Even if the stock market advisers have to quickly analyse and quickly act to the new info released, the events are far beyond the situation leading to random walk when share prices will be totally independent of the last pieces of news and there is going to be not systematic correlation between the one movement and the subsequent ones as Kendal stated. For instance, since summer 2016 all the political news published are negatively affecting investors’ perception about market opportunities especially in USA and England. An investor cannot be lead by any rationality, to invest at a specific market. Subsequently, investor's best rationale is to remain the same currently “safe” shares.

From a personal perspective, I’m an international student graduating “hopefully” this July, the principle plan was to stay in UK and have a prestigious, profitable, managerial job… However, when the Brexit was announced I started making plans/dreams to move to USA but after Trump’s election I ended up to the initial plan. The reasons?? Well… I already live here, I speak the language, I know the culture and “currently” is in a better economic situation than most of European countries. This is called “compromise” and takes place only when events are beyond the situation and only if a guaranteed and safe opportunity comes up further actions will be taken. Even if this was my initial plan and I decided to make it three years ago at the end became a compromise due to the increase of its or any other plan’s risk and lack of evidence about their results in other words uncertainty about future start to exist.

It is the same philosophy for investors, the majority of them tries to avoid high risk investments and invests where the rest does, herd instinct. Or they invest to “unicorn” companies who are expected to raise their value due to their previous negative returns on assets, previous capitals are raised and show positive price momentum.  However, this contradicts the nature of stock market: the higher the risk taken is the higher the return will be. If all investors invest to the most favourable projects then they have to share the returns but if one takes the risk to invest to something different that individual will join all the returns.

Lee and Li argue that companies with “sexy” products can lure people into repeatedly overpaying for stakes. Robin Greenwood and Andrei Shleifer found that survey-based measures of expected returns were the exact opposite of “expected” returns according to the textbooks.

Stock market is like assignments both of them are dependent to luck, whenever you expect a good grade you almost fail but when you think you have failed you get the best mark in class. The variables are who, when and quantity, for share prices’ return depends on who you invest if it is favourable or not, how many others have invested at the same project and finally when you do the investment are there any expected info to be released? Now for the assignment, who is marking the assignment is the person favourable or not, how many other assignments have the person read before and finally when is the individual reading it, was the person in a good or bad mood that day and time?

The conclusion? Always have the opposite expectation from the desired return, it works!! J

No comments:

Post a Comment